top of page
Search

Hulud and the Quiet Return of Install-Time Supply-Chain Attacks

  • Customer Service
  • 21 hours ago
  • 2 min read

The Shai-Hulud supply-chain attack was a reminder that many modern compromises don’t rely on exotic exploits — they rely on trusted dependency installs quietly making outbound network calls.

The attack involved malicious open-source packages that executed install-time scripts (postinstall, setup.py) to selectively fetch second-stage payloads, often only when running in CI environments, and then exfiltrate credentials or environment data.Phylum’s analysis shows how little static scanning or CVE-based tooling helps against this class of attack:


Why this class of attack keeps working

Install-time egress is:

  • Expected (package managers legitimately download things)

  • Implicitly trusted (few teams monitor outbound traffic during installs)

  • Poorly attributed (logs rarely say which dependency accessed the network)

This pattern is not unique to Hulud. Variants of it appear in:

  • Dependency confusion attacks

  • Typosquatting packages

  • Malicious postinstall hooks in npm / PyPI

  • CI-targeted credential harvesting campaigns


A pragmatic mitigation: CI egress allowlisting


One of the few defenses that reliably stops this entire class of attacks is network egress control during CI:

  • Allow only known, expected domains (registries, GitHub, artifact storage)

  • Log or block everything else

  • Do it during dependency installation, not after

To make this easy to adopt, I built a GitHub Action implementing CI egress guard:

  • Simple bash-based enforcement

  • “Dry-run” mode to discover required domains safely

  • No agents, no SaaS, no runtime dependencies

You can try out the action here:👉 GitHub Action: CI Egress Guard


Why this matters beyond Shai-Hulud 2.0


Egress allowlisting doesn’t just catch known malware — it removes the attacker’s ability to evolve:

  • Second-stage payloads can’t be fetched

  • Credential exfiltration fails

  • CI becomes a low-value target

This approach complements SBOMs and policy scanning by adding runtime enforcement — something most SDLC security stacks still lack.

If you’re serious about supply-chain security, watching what your CI talks to is no longer optional.

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page